lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:58:13 +0200
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>,
        Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 2/3] usb: USB Type-C connector class

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 03:46:08PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +config TYPEC
> > > > +	tristate
> > > 
> > > Hah, that says NOTHING about what this code is at all.
> > 
> > Alone the class driver does nothing. Why would the user need to be
> > aware of if it when selecting the Type-C drivers, and what can the
> > user use that information for?
> 
> If you see a blank Kconfig option, what are you supposed to do with it?
> How do you know if you need to enable it or not?  Are you just supposed
> to guess?

But you don't see anything when you are selecting the drivers and that
is the point. You now can't select this separately. There is now no
option for it.

Why should we bother the user with this? The user is most likely only
interested in the drivers and by selecting those the user will get the
interface. The drivers will need to have the dependency to the class
set correctly in any case.


Thanks,

-- 
heikki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ