lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9047.1479811169@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:39:29 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info available

Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:

> No. Just provide a 64 bit high resoultion field, and define it to
> contain nanoseconds. When we need higher resolution to be exported
> to userspace, we use a /feature flag/ to indicate that is contains
> something like attoseconds or the like.

That sounds suspiciously like a bad idea - if you're talking about a flag with
a currently undefined meaning that the kernel can inflict on userspace without
warning to change the meaning of the nanoseconds field to something we haven't
defined yet.

Userspace would have to ask for it.

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ