[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161122021506.GA103691@google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:15:07 -0800
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@...il.com>
Cc: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: rockchip: improve conversion error messages
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:51:23AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #428: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:428:
> + pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
> + __func__, temp, error);
>
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #480: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:480:
> + pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
> + __func__, table->mode);
What patch are you checking? I ran mine through checkpatch, and there
are no problems. Did you perhaps mangle the tabs into spaces when you
saved the patch?
> I'm ready to resend all rockchip thermal patches. (contain them)
I see no reason to resend so far; the only criticism was on the 1st
patch (a non-critical patch to the core thermal code; the others are
relatively independent, as long as you don't care that I'm adding
another error return without fixing up the broken
CONFIG_THERMAL_EMULATION support).
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists