linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: rockchip: improve conversion error messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:33:27 +0800
From:   Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@...il.com>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc:     Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: rockchip: improve conversion error messages

在 2016年11月22日 10:15, Brian Norris 写道:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:51:23AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
>> #428: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:428:
>> +    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
>> +        __func__, temp, error);
>>
>> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
>> #480: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:480:
>> +        pr_err("%s: invalid conversion table, mode=%d\n",
>> +            __func__, table->mode);
> What patch are you checking? I ran mine through checkpatch, and there
> are no problems.

That  just checkcode on Chromeos kernelv4.4,  that trivial things :)
$chromiumos/src/third_party/kernel/v4.4$ checkcode 
drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#428: FILE: drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:428:
+    pr_err("%s: invalid temperature, temp=%d error=%d\n",
+        __func__, temp, error);
...

vi drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c +428 or  vi 
drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c +480,

> Did you perhaps mangle the tabs into spaces when you
> saved the patch?
>
>> I'm ready to resend all rockchip thermal patches. (contain them)
> I see no reason to resend so far; the only criticism was on the 1st
> patch (a non-critical patch to the core thermal code; the others are
> relatively independent, as long as you don't care that I'm adding
> another error return without fixing up the broken
> CONFIG_THERMAL_EMULATION support).
>
> Brian
>