[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161122165107.nk2lm36nhz6wwlyp@earth>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:51:07 +0100
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To: Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] power: supply: tps65217: Remove IRQ data from driver
data
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:18:52PM +0900, Milo Kim wrote:
> IRQ number is only used on requesting the interrupt, so no need to keep
> it inside the driver data.
> In case of polling, poll_task is valid only when polling thread is
> activated.
>
> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/tps65217_charger.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/tps65217_charger.c b/drivers/power/supply/tps65217_charger.c
> index 04f8322..55a4f34 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/tps65217_charger.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/tps65217_charger.c
> @@ -46,8 +46,6 @@ struct tps65217_charger {
> int prev_ac_online;
>
> struct task_struct *poll_task;
> -
> - int irq;
Removal of this (and related changes) look ok. The poll_task changes
are actually only needed due to Patch 1 (which should be dropped imho).
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists