linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: New driver for TI DA8XX/OMAP-L138/AM18XX pinconf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <88b3d16b-6e5b-ea75-d770-35d9adc6c677@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:34:23 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>,
        Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>,
        Bartosz Gołaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: New driver for TI DA8XX/OMAP-L138/AM18XX
 pinconf

On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> This adds a new driver for pinconf on TI DA8XX/OMAP-L138/AM18XX. These

s/DA8XX/DA850/

> SoCs have a separate controller for controlling pullup/pulldown groups.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>

> +static const char *da850_pupd_get_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +						 unsigned int selector)
> +{
> +	return da850_pupd_group_names[selector];
> +}
> +
> +static int da850_pupd_get_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +					 unsigned int selector,
> +					 const unsigned int **pins,
> +					 unsigned int *num_pins)
> +{
> +	*num_pins = 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

usage of get_get_ in the function names above is odd.

Thanks,
Sekhar