linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c3e6535-4b79-9731-f801-c13f007e48ab@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:42:41 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>,
        Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>,
        Bartosz Gołaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: da850: Add node for pullup/pulldown pinconf

On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> This SoC has a separate pin controller for configuring pullup/pulldown
> bias on groups of pins.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> index 8945815..1c0224c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> @@ -210,6 +210,11 @@
>  			};
>  
>  		};
> +		pinconf: pin-controller@...00c {
> +			compatible = "ti,da850-pupd";
> +			reg = <0x22c00c 0x8>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};

Can you please place this below the i2c1 node. I am trying to keep the
nodes sorted by unit address. I know thats broken in many places today,
but lets add the new ones where they should eventually end up.

Thanks,
Sekhar