linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: cq93vc: enable compiling on COMPILE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:48:09 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Simon <horms@...ge.net.au>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        anish kumar <yesanishhere@...il.com>,
        Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
        Jacob Siverskog <jacob@...nage.engineering>,
        "Damien.Horsley" <Damien.Horsley@...tec.com>,
        Jeremy McDermond <nh6z@...z.net>,
        Bard Liao <bardliao@...ltek.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: cq93vc: enable compiling on COMPILE_TEST

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

> 
> Hi Lee, Mark
> 
> > > Current cq93vc sound codec indicates that it has
> > > MFD_DAVINCI_VOICECODEC dependency, but it doesn't.
> > > This means we can compile it from non DAVINCE environment
> > > by COMPILE_TEST.
> > > These patches solve this issue.
> > > I tested this on ARCH=x86 + make allyesconfig, and
> > > ARCH=ARM + shmobile_defconfig + COMPILE_TEST.
> > > 
> > > Kuninori Morimoto (2):
> > >       mfd: davinci_voicecodec: tidyup header difinitions
> > >       ASoC: cq93vc: remove MFD_DAVINCI_VOICECODEC dependency for CQ0093VC
> > 
> > I know [2/2] had Acked-by from Mark, and [1/2] was accepted by Lee.
> > I could find [1/2] patch on linux-next tree today.
> > But, I'm afraid I can't find [2/2] patch on linux-next.
> 
> I mean, I (and Mark too?) thought Lee can handle [2/2] patch,
> but it seems not (?). So, my question is who can handle it ?

I didn't see anything build-time dependant.

Unless I missed something?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog