linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 4/9] tpm: drop tpm1_chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:03:39 +0530
From:   Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, peterhuewe@....de,
        tpmdd@...horst.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/9] tpm: drop tpm1_chip_register(/unregister)



On 11/22/2016 10:12 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:00:51AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
>>> Check for TPM2 chip in tpm_sysfs_add_device, tpm_bios_log_setup and
>>> tpm_bios_log_teardown in order to make code flow cleaner and to enable
>>> to implement TPM 2.0 support later on. This is partially derived from
>>> the commit by Nayna Jain with the extension that also tpm1_chip_register
>>> is dropped.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> This commit remains unreviewed and tested. I'm in the author role here
>> so I cannot help with this. If that does not happen soon I cannot put
>> this into the pull request.
>
> I tested it on my ARM system when I tested your branch.
>
> I think it looks better this way..
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
>
> Jason
>

 From my side also, as part of testing the whole patchset, I have tested 
this patch.

Tested-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thanks & Regards,
   - Nayna