[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161127213516.GF13318@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 22:35:16 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: vf610-zii-dev-rev-b: Add missing newline
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:30:54PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 27.11.2016 um 22:17 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:54:44PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> Found while reviewing Marvell dsa bindings usage.
> >
> > Hi Andreas
> >
> > It is good practice to put the maintainer you expect to accept the
> > patch on the To: line. You have at least two different maintainers on
> > Cc: so it is currently ambiguous. And these lists can be high volume,
> > so without a copy in the maintainers inbox, patches can be overlooked.
>
> As a vf610 DT patch with LAKML in To I am expecting it to be handled by
> Shawn or anyone from the NXP/ARM side.
So please have Shawn as To:
The patch you are fixing went through Dave Miller, who is also on Cc:,
hence the ambiguity.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists