[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161230070703.GO6177@dragon>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 15:07:04 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: vf610-zii-dev-rev-b: Add missing newline
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:35:16PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:30:54PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 27.11.2016 um 22:17 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:54:44PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > >> Found while reviewing Marvell dsa bindings usage.
> > >
> > > Hi Andreas
> > >
> > > It is good practice to put the maintainer you expect to accept the
> > > patch on the To: line. You have at least two different maintainers on
> > > Cc: so it is currently ambiguous. And these lists can be high volume,
> > > so without a copy in the maintainers inbox, patches can be overlooked.
> >
> > As a vf610 DT patch with LAKML in To I am expecting it to be handled by
> > Shawn or anyone from the NXP/ARM side.
>
> So please have Shawn as To:
>
> The patch you are fixing went through Dave Miller, who is also on Cc:,
> hence the ambiguity.
The good practice was broken from the beginning when patch "arm: vf610:
zii devel b: Add support for switch interrupts") went through net tree,
even without me on copy.
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists