[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ad1108a-43c4-46f8-4683-1c4b89996036@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:52:26 +0100
From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>,
Michal Hrusecki <Michal.Hrusecky@....cz>,
Tomas Hlavacek <tomas.hlavacek@....cz>,
Bedřicha Košatu <bedrich.kosata@....cz>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: mvebu: Add Armada 38x labels and clean up
Turris Omnia
Hi Russell,
Am 28.11.2016 um 11:37 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 07:51:39PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> To more consistently reference nodes by label, add labels for sata,
>> usb2, sdhci and usb3 nodes.
>>
>> Convert all other 38x boards for consistency. Add labels for nfc and rtc.
>
> Please don't do this for clearfog - there's changes in the pipeline which
> completely replace armada-388-clearfog.dts because there's a "base" and
> "pro" versions of this hardware now, and making such a huge change will
> effectively mean we have to start over with the DT files.
Would it help to split it back up into a series of add-labels,
use-labels like I had originally? Then you could start using them in
your refactoring as soon as the add-labels patch gets applied. Or are
you completely against this style?
Thanks for pointing this out,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists