[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e29e1a96-c9d5-d9b1-a42d-8afddc2714a7@kleine-koenig.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:54:11 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michal Hrusecki <Michal.Hrusecky@....cz>,
Tomas Hlavacek <tomas.hlavacek@....cz>,
Bedřicha Košatu <bedrich.kosata@....cz>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: mvebu: Add Armada 38x labels and clean up
Turris Omnia
Hello,
On 11/28/2016 11:52 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Please don't do this for clearfog - there's changes in the pipeline which
>> completely replace armada-388-clearfog.dts because there's a "base" and
>> "pro" versions of this hardware now, and making such a huge change will
>> effectively mean we have to start over with the DT files.
>
> Would it help to split it back up into a series of add-labels,
> use-labels like I had originally? Then you could start using them in
> your refactoring as soon as the add-labels patch gets applied. Or are
> you completely against this style?
I'd even go as far as:
1: add labels to .dtsi
2: use labels on .dts#1
3: use labels on .dts#2
...
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists