[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb141a59-af81-2032-60be-44df10348c20@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:58:31 +0100
From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michal Hrusecki <Michal.Hrusecky@....cz>,
Tomas Hlavacek <tomas.hlavacek@....cz>,
Bedřicha Košatu <bedrich.kosata@....cz>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: mvebu: Add Armada 38x labels and clean up
Turris Omnia
Hi,
Am 28.11.2016 um 11:54 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> On 11/28/2016 11:52 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Would it help to split it back up into a series of add-labels,
>> use-labels like I had originally? Then you could start using them in
>> your refactoring as soon as the add-labels patch gets applied. Or are
>> you completely against this style?
>
> I'd even go as far as:
>
> 1: add labels to .dtsi
> 2: use labels on .dts#1
> 3: use labels on .dts#2
> ...
That was what I had in mind. :) I even considered reusing the existing
labels first, then adding more and converting more nodes.
Making the patches smaller will hopefully make them more easily
reviewable at the same time.
Cheers,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists