| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1480343083-48731-1-git-send-email-dvyukov@google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:24:43 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com,
andreyknvl@...gle.com, joe@...ches.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller@...glegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: fix report formatting
Since commit 4bcc595ccd80 ("printk: reinstate KERN_CONT for printing
continuation lines") printk() requires KERN_CONT to continue log
messages. Lots of printk() in lockdep.c and print_ip_sym() don't
have it. As the result lockdep reports are completely messed.
Add missing KERN_CONT and inline print_ip_sym() where necessary.
Without this patch all scripts that parse kernel bug reports
are broken. So it makes sense to get this into 4.9.
Cc: aryabinin@...tuozzo.com
Cc: andreyknvl@...gle.com
Cc: joe@...ches.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: syzkaller@...glegroups.com
---
Any better suggestions on how to fix this systematically
rather than sprinkle KERN_CONT here and there?
Most likely I got it wrong somewhere. Output tests would be nice...
Example of a messed report:
[ 332.843850] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 332.850253] 4.9.0-rc5+ #41 Not tainted
[ 332.854153] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 332.860558] syz-executor0/5036 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 332.860565] (
[ 332.860568] rtnl_mutex
[ 332.860569] ){+.+.+.}
[ 332.860586] , at:
[ 332.860587] [<ffffffff86b3d6ac>] rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x20
[ 332.860589]
[ 332.860589] but task is already holding lock:
[ 332.860593] (
[ 332.860596] &net->packet.sklist_lock
[ 332.860598] ){+.+...}
[ 332.860610] , at:
[ 332.860611] [<ffffffff873541a6>] packet_diag_dump+0x1a6/0x1920
[ 332.860613]
[ 332.860613] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 332.860613]
[ 332.860615]
[ 332.860615] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 332.860619]
[ 332.860619] -> #3
[ 332.860622] (
[ 332.860624] &net->packet.sklist_lock
[ 332.860626] ){+.+...}
[ 332.860626] :
[ 332.860638]
[ 332.860639] [<ffffffff81569446>] __lock_acquire+0x2156/0x3380
[ 332.860647]
[ 332.860648] [<ffffffff8156b542>] lock_acquire+0x2a2/0x790
[ 332.860659]
[ 332.860660] [<ffffffff8813754f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x23f/0xf20
[ 332.860670]
[ 332.860670] [<ffffffff873541a6>] packet_diag_dump+0x1a6/0x1920
[ 332.860681]
[ 332.860682] [<ffffffff86ca8096>] netlink_dump+0x576/0xd70
[ 332.860691]
[ 332.860691] [<ffffffff86cac85a>] __netlink_dump_start+0x4ea/0x760
[ 332.860701]
[ 332.860702] [<ffffffff87353f37>] packet_diag_handler_dump+0x247/0x310
[ 332.860712]
[ 332.860713] [<ffffffff86b6f163>] sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x313/0x390
[ 332.860723]
[ 332.860723] [<ffffffff86cb5020>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x2b0/0x390
[ 332.860733]
[ 332.860733] [<ffffffff86b6e66f>] sock_diag_rcv+0x2f/0x40
[ 332.860743]
[ 332.860744] [<ffffffff86cb3854>] netlink_unicast+0x514/0x730
[ 332.860754]
[ 332.860754] [<ffffffff86cb4514>] netlink_sendmsg+0xaa4/0xe50
[ 332.860765]
[ 332.860766] [<ffffffff86a6da7f>] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x110
[ 332.860776]
[ 332.860776] [<ffffffff86a6ddeb>] sock_write_iter+0x32b/0x620
[ 332.860787]
[ 332.860787] [<ffffffff81a6e5b3>] do_iter_readv_writev+0x363/0x670
[ 332.860797]
[ 332.860797] [<ffffffff81a71001>] do_readv_writev+0x431/0x9b0
[ 332.860806]
[ 332.860807] [<ffffffff81a71b3c>] vfs_writev+0x8c/0xc0
[ 332.860815]
[ 332.860816] [<ffffffff81a71c85>] do_writev+0x115/0x2d0
[ 332.860825]
[ 332.860826] [<ffffffff81a7543c>] SyS_writev+0x2c/0x40
[ 332.860837]
[ 332.860837] [<ffffffff88147845>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
[ 332.860841]
[ 332.860841] -> #2
[ 332.860844] (
[ 332.860846] nlk->cb_mutex
[ 332.860848] ){+.+.+.}
[ 332.860849] :
[ 332.860858]
[ 332.860859] [<ffffffff81569446>] __lock_acquire+0x2156/0x3380
[ 332.860866]
[ 332.860866] [<ffffffff8156b542>] lock_acquire+0x2a2/0x790
[ 332.860875]
[ 332.860875] [<ffffffff8813754f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x23f/0xf20
[ 332.860884]
[ 332.860885] [<ffffffff86cac469>] __netlink_dump_start+0xf9/0x760
[ 332.860894]
[ 332.860895] [<ffffffff86cfbb9f>] ctnetlink_get_ct_unconfirmed+0x17f/0x220
[ 332.860904]
[ 332.860904] [<ffffffff86cc7a1e>] nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x9be/0xd60
[ 332.860919]
[ 332.860920] [<ffffffff86cb5020>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x2b0/0x390
[ 332.860926]
[ 332.860927] [<ffffffff86cc644c>] nfnetlink_rcv+0x7cc/0x10c0
[ 332.860935]
[ 332.860935] [<ffffffff86cb3854>] netlink_unicast+0x514/0x730
[ 332.860951]
[ 332.860951] [<ffffffff86cb4514>] netlink_sendmsg+0xaa4/0xe50
[ 332.860961]
[ 332.860961] [<ffffffff86a6da7f>] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x110
[ 332.860970]
[ 332.860971] [<ffffffff86a6ddeb>] sock_write_iter+0x32b/0x620
[ 332.860979]
[ 332.860980] [<ffffffff81a6e5b3>] do_iter_readv_writev+0x363/0x670
[ 332.860988]
[ 332.860989] [<ffffffff81a71001>] do_readv_writev+0x431/0x9b0
[ 332.860997]
[ 332.860997] [<ffffffff81a71b3c>] vfs_writev+0x8c/0xc0
[ 332.861005]
[ 332.861006] [<ffffffff81a71c85>] do_writev+0x115/0x2d0
[ 332.861014]
[ 332.861014] [<ffffffff81a7543c>] SyS_writev+0x2c/0x40
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 589d763..4d7ffc0 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -506,13 +506,13 @@ static void __print_lock_name(struct lock_class *class)
name = class->name;
if (!name) {
name = __get_key_name(class->key, str);
- printk("%s", name);
+ printk(KERN_CONT "%s", name);
} else {
- printk("%s", name);
+ printk(KERN_CONT "%s", name);
if (class->name_version > 1)
- printk("#%d", class->name_version);
+ printk(KERN_CONT "#%d", class->name_version);
if (class->subclass)
- printk("/%d", class->subclass);
+ printk(KERN_CONT "/%d", class->subclass);
}
}
@@ -522,9 +522,9 @@ static void print_lock_name(struct lock_class *class)
get_usage_chars(class, usage);
- printk(" (");
+ printk(KERN_CONT " (");
__print_lock_name(class);
- printk("){%s}", usage);
+ printk(KERN_CONT "){%s}", usage);
}
static void print_lockdep_cache(struct lockdep_map *lock)
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static void print_lockdep_cache(struct lockdep_map *lock)
if (!name)
name = __get_key_name(lock->key->subkeys, str);
- printk("%s", name);
+ printk(KERN_CONT "%s", name);
}
static void print_lock(struct held_lock *hlock)
@@ -551,13 +551,13 @@ static void print_lock(struct held_lock *hlock)
barrier();
if (!class_idx || (class_idx - 1) >= MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS) {
- printk("<RELEASED>\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT "<RELEASED>\n");
return;
}
print_lock_name(lock_classes + class_idx - 1);
- printk(", at: ");
- print_ip_sym(hlock->acquire_ip);
+ printk(KERN_CONT ", at: [<%p>] %pS\n",
+ (void *)hlock->acquire_ip, (void *)hlock->acquire_ip);
}
static void lockdep_print_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr)
@@ -792,8 +792,8 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
printk("\nnew class %p: %s", class->key, class->name);
if (class->name_version > 1)
- printk("#%d", class->name_version);
- printk("\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT "#%d", class->name_version);
+ printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
dump_stack();
if (!graph_lock()) {
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ print_circular_bug_entry(struct lock_list *target, int depth)
return 0;
printk("\n-> #%u", depth);
print_lock_name(target->class);
- printk(":\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ":\n");
print_stack_trace(&target->trace, 6);
return 0;
@@ -1102,11 +1102,11 @@ print_circular_lock_scenario(struct held_lock *src,
if (parent != source) {
printk("Chain exists of:\n ");
__print_lock_name(source);
- printk(" --> ");
+ printk(KERN_CONT " --> ");
__print_lock_name(parent);
- printk(" --> ");
+ printk(KERN_CONT " --> ");
__print_lock_name(target);
- printk("\n\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT "\n\n");
}
printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n");
@@ -1114,16 +1114,16 @@ print_circular_lock_scenario(struct held_lock *src,
printk(" ---- ----\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(target);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(parent);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(target);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(source);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n");
}
@@ -1359,22 +1359,22 @@ static void print_lock_class_header(struct lock_class *class, int depth)
printk("%*s->", depth, "");
print_lock_name(class);
- printk(" ops: %lu", class->ops);
- printk(" {\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT " ops: %lu", class->ops);
+ printk(KERN_CONT " {\n");
for (bit = 0; bit < LOCK_USAGE_STATES; bit++) {
if (class->usage_mask & (1 << bit)) {
int len = depth;
len += printk("%*s %s", depth, "", usage_str[bit]);
- len += printk(" at:\n");
+ len += printk(KERN_CONT " at:\n");
print_stack_trace(class->usage_traces + bit, len);
}
}
printk("%*s }\n", depth, "");
- printk("%*s ... key at: ",depth,"");
- print_ip_sym((unsigned long)class->key);
+ printk("%*s ... key at: [<%p>] %pS\n",
+ depth, "", class->key, class->key);
}
/*
@@ -1437,11 +1437,11 @@ print_irq_lock_scenario(struct lock_list *safe_entry,
if (middle_class != unsafe_class) {
printk("Chain exists of:\n ");
__print_lock_name(safe_class);
- printk(" --> ");
+ printk(KERN_CONT " --> ");
__print_lock_name(middle_class);
- printk(" --> ");
+ printk(KERN_CONT " --> ");
__print_lock_name(unsafe_class);
- printk("\n\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT "\n\n");
}
printk(" Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:\n\n");
@@ -1449,18 +1449,18 @@ print_irq_lock_scenario(struct lock_list *safe_entry,
printk(" ---- ----\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(unsafe_class);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk(" local_irq_disable();\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(safe_class);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(middle_class);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk(" <Interrupt>\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(safe_class);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n");
}
@@ -1497,9 +1497,9 @@ print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr,
print_lock(prev);
printk("which would create a new lock dependency:\n");
print_lock_name(hlock_class(prev));
- printk(" ->");
+ printk(KERN_CONT " ->");
print_lock_name(hlock_class(next));
- printk("\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
printk("\nbut this new dependency connects a %s-irq-safe lock:\n",
irqclass);
@@ -1521,8 +1521,7 @@ print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr,
lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
- printk("\nthe dependencies between %s-irq-safe lock", irqclass);
- printk(" and the holding lock:\n");
+ printk("\nthe dependencies between %s-irq-safe lock and the holding lock:\n", irqclass);
if (!save_trace(&prev_root->trace))
return 0;
print_shortest_lock_dependencies(backwards_entry, prev_root);
@@ -1694,10 +1693,10 @@ print_deadlock_scenario(struct held_lock *nxt,
printk(" ----\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(prev);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(next);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n");
printk(" May be due to missing lock nesting notation\n\n");
}
@@ -1891,9 +1890,9 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
graph_unlock();
printk("\n new dependency: ");
print_lock_name(hlock_class(prev));
- printk(" => ");
+ printk(KERN_CONT " => ");
print_lock_name(hlock_class(next));
- printk("\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
dump_stack();
return graph_lock();
}
@@ -2343,11 +2342,11 @@ print_usage_bug_scenario(struct held_lock *lock)
printk(" ----\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(class);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk(" <Interrupt>\n");
printk(" lock(");
__print_lock_name(class);
- printk(");\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ");\n");
printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n");
}
@@ -2522,14 +2521,18 @@ check_usage_backwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
void print_irqtrace_events(struct task_struct *curr)
{
printk("irq event stamp: %u\n", curr->irq_events);
- printk("hardirqs last enabled at (%u): ", curr->hardirq_enable_event);
- print_ip_sym(curr->hardirq_enable_ip);
- printk("hardirqs last disabled at (%u): ", curr->hardirq_disable_event);
- print_ip_sym(curr->hardirq_disable_ip);
- printk("softirqs last enabled at (%u): ", curr->softirq_enable_event);
- print_ip_sym(curr->softirq_enable_ip);
- printk("softirqs last disabled at (%u): ", curr->softirq_disable_event);
- print_ip_sym(curr->softirq_disable_ip);
+ printk("hardirqs last enabled at (%u): [<%p>] %pS\n",
+ curr->hardirq_enable_event, (void *)curr->hardirq_enable_ip,
+ (void *)curr->hardirq_enable_ip);
+ printk("hardirqs last disabled at (%u): [<%p>] %pS\n",
+ curr->hardirq_disable_event, (void *)curr->hardirq_disable_ip,
+ (void *)curr->hardirq_disable_ip);
+ printk("softirqs last enabled at (%u): [<%p>] %pS\n",
+ curr->softirq_enable_event, (void *)curr->softirq_enable_ip,
+ (void *)curr->softirq_enable_ip);
+ printk("softirqs last disabled at (%u): [<%p>] %pS\n",
+ curr->softirq_disable_event, (void *)curr->softirq_disable_ip,
+ (void *)curr->softirq_disable_ip);
}
static int HARDIRQ_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
@@ -3235,8 +3238,8 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
if (very_verbose(class)) {
printk("\nacquire class [%p] %s", class->key, class->name);
if (class->name_version > 1)
- printk("#%d", class->name_version);
- printk("\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT "#%d", class->name_version);
+ printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
dump_stack();
}
@@ -3378,7 +3381,7 @@ print_unlock_imbalance_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
printk("%s/%d is trying to release lock (",
curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
print_lockdep_cache(lock);
- printk(") at:\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ") at:\n");
print_ip_sym(ip);
printk("but there are no more locks to release!\n");
printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n");
@@ -3871,7 +3874,7 @@ print_lock_contention_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
printk("%s/%d is trying to contend lock (",
curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
print_lockdep_cache(lock);
- printk(") at:\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT ") at:\n");
print_ip_sym(ip);
printk("but there are no locks held!\n");
printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n");
--
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
Powered by blists - more mailing lists