[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161128143919.GE3924@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 06:39:19 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] hlist_add_tail_rcu disable sparse warning
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 07:52:23PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 22:48:19 +0200
>
> > I would appreciate review to confirm the function doesn't
> > do anything unsafe though.
> >
> > In particular, should this use __hlist_for_each_rcu instead?
> > I note that __hlist_for_each_rcu does rcu_dereference
> > internally, which is missing here.
>
> I personally think it should use __hlist_for_each_rcu, otherwise
> nothing expresses the rcu-ness of the operation.
I like Dave's suggestion. Michael, does that change work for you?
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists