linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mremap: use mmu gather logic for tlb flush in mremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <31b1393c-22d2-8a49-842c-9678a1921441@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:32:35 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mremap: use mmu gather logic for tlb flush in mremap

On 11/28/2016 12:40 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> As suggested by Linus, the same mmu gather logic could be used for tlb
> flush in mremap and this patch just did that.
> 
> Note that since there is no page added to "struct mmu_gather" for free
> during mremap, when tlb needs to be flushed, we can use tlb_flush_mmu or
> tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly. Using tlb_flush_mmu could also avoid exporting
> tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly. But tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly *looks* more clear and
> straightforward so I end up using it.

OK, so the code before this patch was passing around a pointer to
'need_flush', and we basically just pass around an mmu_gather instead.
It doesn't really simplify the code _too_ much, although it does make it
less confusing than when we saw 'need_flush' mixed with 'force_flush' in
the code.

tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly() has exactly one other use: zap_pte_range() for
flushing the TLB before pte_unmap_unlock():

        if (force_flush)
                tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb);
        pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl);

But, both call-sites are still keeping 'force_flush' to store the
information about whether we ever saw a dirty pte.  If we moved _that_
logic into the x86 mmu_gather code, we could get rid of all the
'force_flush' tracking in both call sites.  It also makes us a bit more
future-proof against these page_mkclean() races if we ever grow a third
site for clearing ptes.

Instead of exporting and calling tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(), we'd need
something like tlb_flush_mmu_before_ptl_release() (but with a better
name, of course :).