[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFy_qBh6iz+vH+6QKyLcboRiu8r2b6KY_gxLBTqeJprgNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:42:07 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mremap: use mmu gather logic for tlb flush in mremap
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>
> But, both call-sites are still keeping 'force_flush' to store the
> information about whether we ever saw a dirty pte. If we moved _that_
> logic into the x86 mmu_gather code, we could get rid of all the
> 'force_flush' tracking in both call sites. It also makes us a bit more
> future-proof against these page_mkclean() races if we ever grow a third
> site for clearing ptes.
Yeah, that sounds like a nice cleanup and would put all the real state
into that mmu_gather structure.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists