lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:34:08 -0800
From:   Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: VMX: Handle RFLAGS.TF in skip_emulated_instruction

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 28/11/2016 17:13, Kyle Huey wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> This code is pretty much the same as kvm_vcpu_check_singlestep.  Let's
>>> not duplicate the code and implement skip_emulated_instruction can be
>>> implemented in x86.c, like
>>>
>>>         unsigned long rflags = kvm_x86_ops->get_rflags(vcpu);
>>>         int r = EMULATE_DONE;
>>>
>>>         /* This would be the no_trap variant */
>>>         kvm_x86_ops->skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
>>>         kvm_vcpu_check_singlestep(vcpu, rflags, &r);
>>>         return r == EMULATE_DONE;
>>>
>>> (because x86.c/vmx.c/svm.c are separate modules, when moving the function
>>> to x86.c you should rename it to kvm_skip_emulated_instruction).
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>
>> They're not exactly the same.  For some reason I don't understand
>> kvm_vcpu_check_singlestep clears the trap flag.  Perhaps that is also
>> a bug?
>
> The Intel manual says "The processor clears the TF flag before calling
> the exception handler" (17.3.1.4), so I think you should do it too.

The processor does this automatically. "When accessing an exception or
interrupt handler through either an interrupt gate or a trap gate, the
processor clears the TF flag in the EFLAGS register after it saves the
contents of the EFLAGS register on the stack." (Vol 3, 6.12.1.2)
Empirically, this holds when injecting an exception on VM entry. If
you take the x86/debug.c test from kvm-unit-tests and inspect RFLAGS
in handle_db (not regs->rflags, but the actual RFLAGS register while
running the exception handler) the TF is clear. And, if you modify my
patch to clear TF before returning, the single stepping ceases after
the CPUID instruction because the TF was in fact cleared for good.

- Kyle

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ