linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/swap: Regular page swap optimizations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:07:08 -0800
From:   Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Ying Huang <ying.huang@...el.com>, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, aaron.lu@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/swap: Regular page swap optimizations

On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > > 
> > > Andrew,
> > > 
> > > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far.
> > > Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more__
> > > depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10?
> > > Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look.
> > 
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > Want to give you a ping to see if you can consider merging this series,
> > as there are no objections from anyone since its posting 2 weeks ago?
> Well, you did say "for 4.10", with which I agree.  So I have them
> buffered for processing around the 4.10-rc1 timeframe.
> 

Thanks.  That will be great if the patchset can go into 4.10-rc1.

Tim