lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1483641642.2833.10.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:40:42 -0800
From:   Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Ying Huang <ying.huang@...el.com>, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, aaron.lu@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/swap: Regular page swap optimizations

On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > > 
> > > Andrew,
> > > 
> > > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far.
> > > Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more__
> > > depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10?
> > > Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look.
> > 
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > Want to give you a ping to see if you can consider merging this series,
> > as there are no objections from anyone since its posting 2 weeks ago?
> Well, you did say "for 4.10", with which I agree.  So I have them
> buffered for processing around the 4.10-rc1 timeframe.
> 

Andrew,

We've updated the patchset to v4.  

Is there anything we need to modify for the patch set to be 
picked up for mm tree?

Thanks.

Tim

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ