[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161129092624.GA28600@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:26:24 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
Cc: Robert O'Callahan <robert@...llahan.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)"
<user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)"
<user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)"
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/7] x86/arch_prctl/64: Rename do_arch_prctl to
do_arch_prctl_64
* Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In order to introduce new arch_prctls that are not 64 bit only, rename the
> >> existing 64 bit implementation to do_arch_prctl_64(). Also rename the second
> >> argument to arch_prctl(), which will no longer always be an address.
> >
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> >> void entry_SYSCALL_64(void);
> >> +long do_arch_prctl_64(struct task_struct *task, int code, unsigned long arg2);
> >> #endif
> >
> > Could you please also rename the weirdly named 'code' argument to 'option',
> > to be in line with the existing sys_prctl() interface nomenclature?
>
> arch_prctl consistently uses 'code' throughout the kernel and in the
> main page. This renaming should probably be done separately if
> desired.
'arch_prctl' is essentially an x86-ism that arbitrarily changed 'option' to 'code'
to implement a sub-option where the option was indeed 'code' - but with _your_
changes it becomes outright misleading and confusing: as the 'code' is not code
anymore but one of the several options.
The core kernel uses 'option' and we should follow that nomenclature.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists