linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: Remove unuseful 'return' and 'break' statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMz4kuKMw8ejQRP=SXaJT3me0z_jZ_52ZdqzvAsRDKDcY3Tx9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:27:29 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To:     Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
        USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: Remove unuseful 'return' and 'break' statement

On 28 November 2016 at 23:14, Mathias Nyman
<mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 28.11.2016 09:41, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 28 November 2016 at 15:21, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 02:29:25PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mathias,
>>>>
>>>> On 24 November 2016 at 19:16, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Since these 'return' statements are not generally useful in void
>>>>> function, remove them. Also remove one unuseful 'break' statement
>>>>> in xhci_setup_addressable_virt_dev() function.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>>   - Add description of removing 'break' statement in commitlog.
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could you apply this patch if there are no other comments? Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Less than a week response for a simple cleanup patch?  Why the rush and
>>> pressure?  Relax, this really isn't an important patch...
>>
>>
>> I am sorry for the pressure, I just thought it is one simple cleanup
>> patch. It is okay for me to wait for.
>>
>
> Looks ok.
>
> If it applies I'll send it forward to usb-next after 4.10-rc1,
> It should end up in 4.11

Thanks.

-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards