[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1480500425.2527.30.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:07:05 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Jiancheng Xue <xuejiancheng@...ilicon.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, afd@...com, s-anna@...com,
yanhaifeng@...ilicon.com, zhangfei.gao@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] reset: ti_syscon: fix a ti_syscon_reset_status issue
Hi Jiancheng,
Am Mittwoch, den 30.11.2016, 09:03 +0800 schrieb Jiancheng Xue:
> If STATUS_SET was not set, ti_syscon_reset_status would always return 0
> no matter whether the status_bit was set or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiancheng Xue <xuejiancheng@...ilicon.com>
Thank you, I've added:
Fixes: cc7c2bb1493c ("reset: add TI SYSCON based reset driver")
and applied the patch.
regards
Philipp
> ---
> Change Log
> v2:
> - Refined this patch according to the suggestion from Andrew F. Davis.
>
> drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c b/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c
> index 47f0ffd..1799fd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-ti-syscon.c
> @@ -154,8 +154,8 @@ static int ti_syscon_reset_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - return (reset_state & BIT(control->status_bit)) &&
> - (control->flags & STATUS_SET);
> + return !(reset_state & BIT(control->status_bit)) ==
> + !(control->flags & STATUS_SET);
> }
>
> static struct reset_control_ops ti_syscon_reset_ops = {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists