[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161202192844.elq2py3cxizjs2bx@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 20:28:44 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@...il.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] x86/xen: Add a Xen-specific sync_core()
implementation
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:24:09AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The optimize-nops thing needs it too, I think.
Ah, it is called only from apply_alternatives() but sure, it is safer
this way. Lemme do that and run it through the boxes to see whether
anything catches fire.
> Again, this will never matter in practice (even if somebody has a i486
> s till, the prefetch window size is like 16 bytes or something), but
> from a documentation standpoint it's good.
Right.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists