[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161205112421.GB14058@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:24:21 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
cmetcalf@...lanox.com, panand@...hat.com, mark.rutland@....com,
james.morse@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com, labbott@...hat.com,
shijie.huang@....com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, pankaj.m@...sung.com, ajeet.y@...sung.com,
cpgs@...sung.com, Vaneet Narang <v.narang@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: Correcting format specifier for printing 64
bit addresses
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:39:53PM +0530, Maninder Singh wrote:
> This patch corrects format specifier for printing 64 bit addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vaneet Narang <v.narang@...sung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++++--
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Any reason not to fix kvm/trace.h too?
Anyway, rest of this looks fine:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists