[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMGZ=H6gAnMHkbLjHmSiCmcqvL7gK=_x0Aj-roErpdB5h8xxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 22:33:14 +0100
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: bio linked list corruption.
On 5 December 2016 at 21:35, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Note for Ingo and Peter: this patch has not been tested at all. But
> Vegard did test an earlier patch of mine that just verified that yes,
> the issue really was that wait queue entries remained on the wait
> queue head just as we were about to return and free it.
The second patch has been running for 1h+ without any problems of any
kind. I should typically have seen 2 crashes by now. I'll let it run
overnight to be sure.
Vegard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists