lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2394CAB0-41C1-4F3B-AF94-03D302F6ABF5@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 21:55:04 +0000
From:   "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:     James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 3/6] staging: lustre: obdclass: Create a
 header for obdo related functions


> On Dec 5, 2016, at 13:50, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:40:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
>> -	__u32 local_flags = 0;
>> +	u32 local_flags = 0;
> 
>> -	if (local_flags != 0) {
>> +	if (local_flags) {
> 
> Please avoid these unrelated white space changes.

Some projects (e.g. ext4 that I work with most) allow whitespace changes
as part of related changes to the code, since the code is being modified
anyway, and frown upon whitespace-only changes because they cause churn
in the code and otherwise introduce patch merge conflicts for relatively
minor benefits by themselves.

My preference is to allow whitespace cleanups in code being modified as
part of a patch that is making other fixes, since a few whitespace changes
don't typically make it any harder to review the patch.  If it gets so
far as moving blocks of code between files and this doesn't appear cleanly
in the patch then I'd ask for a separate patch.

Cheers, Andreas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ