linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SPCR: check bit width for the 16550 UART

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5bc8527-4dbc-8411-a441-7e7aebcbbfed@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 18:27:07 -0500
From:   Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
To:     Duc Dang <dhdang@....com>,
        Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
        Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
        Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SPCR: check bit width for the 16550 UART

Duc, Aleksey, all,

I have a question about this...

On 12/05/2016 01:51 PM, Duc Dang wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Aleksey Makarov
> <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Check the 'Register Bit Width' field of the ACPI Generic Address
>> Structure that specifies the address of the UART registers to
>> decide if the driver should use "mmio32" access instead of "mmio".
>>
>> If the driver is other than 16550 the access with is defined
>> by the Interface Type field of the SPCR table.

I have two questions about this:

1). Why is this not a full 16550 (ACPI_DBG2_16550_COMPATIBLE)?

2). Why is it a ACPI_DBG2_16550_SUBSET you are assuming here?

The SPCR and DBG2 spec clearly state that the _SUBSET is intended
to represent a UART compatible with the earlier DGBP specification,
not that a UART is a "subset" of a full 16550 (which seems to be
the assumption in this patch). It's important we get this right.

I built a test kernel with this patch and updated ACPI tables earlier,
but it didn't boot with a console because I had left it a subtype 0,
but just changed the width to 32 bit, which is what I expected.

Further, I've heard back from Microsoft and they're looking at
adding a specific subtype for this. If they do, I'm inclined to
address existing designs with your patch (but I would favor this
check because against the full 16550) and then switch newer APM
based designs to the new subtype.

Jon.

-- 
Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop