linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SPCR: check bit width for the 16550 UART

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADaLNDn9ZVaZNc0B6_gJ7wBUBPne4qNpYeiPmUO7_SBzsW+srA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:52:48 -0800
From:   Duc Dang <dhdang@....com>
To:     Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
Cc:     Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
        Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
        Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SPCR: check bit width for the 16550 UART

Hi Jon,

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com> wrote:
> Duc, Aleksey, all,
>
> I have a question about this...
>
> On 12/05/2016 01:51 PM, Duc Dang wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Aleksey Makarov
>> <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> Check the 'Register Bit Width' field of the ACPI Generic Address
>>> Structure that specifies the address of the UART registers to
>>> decide if the driver should use "mmio32" access instead of "mmio".
>>>
>>> If the driver is other than 16550 the access with is defined
>>> by the Interface Type field of the SPCR table.
>
> I have two questions about this:
>
> 1). Why is this not a full 16550 (ACPI_DBG2_16550_COMPATIBLE)?
>
> 2). Why is it a ACPI_DBG2_16550_SUBSET you are assuming here?

The patch is actually applied for both ACPI_DBG2_16550_COMPATIBLE and
ACPI_DBG2_16500_SUBSET. Or I misunderstood your question? The end
result after applying the patch on linux-next is like this:
        switch (table->interface_type) {
        case ACPI_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_32BIT:
                iotype = "mmio32";
                /* fall through */
        case ACPI_DBG2_ARM_PL011:
        case ACPI_DBG2_ARM_SBSA_GENERIC:
        case ACPI_DBG2_BCM2835:
                uart = "pl011";
                break;
        case ACPI_DBG2_16550_COMPATIBLE:
        case ACPI_DBG2_16550_SUBSET:
                if (table->serial_port.space_id ==
                        ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY &&
                    table->serial_port.bit_width == 32)
                        iotype = "mmio32";
                uart = "uart";
                break;
        default:
                err = -ENOENT;
                goto done;
        }

>
> The SPCR and DBG2 spec clearly state that the _SUBSET is intended
> to represent a UART compatible with the earlier DGBP specification,
> not that a UART is a "subset" of a full 16550 (which seems to be
> the assumption in this patch). It's important we get this right.
>
> I built a test kernel with this patch and updated ACPI tables earlier,
> but it didn't boot with a console because I had left it a subtype 0,
> but just changed the width to 32 bit, which is what I expected.

On Mustang 3.06.25 firmware, DBG2 table has 'Port Type = 0x8000',
'Port subtype = 0x0001'

But I am still curious why setting subtype to '0' does not work on
your board. Are you using Mustang or m400?
>
> Further, I've heard back from Microsoft and they're looking at
> adding a specific subtype for this. If they do, I'm inclined to
> address existing designs with your patch (but I would favor this
> check because against the full 16550) and then switch newer APM
> based designs to the new subtype.

Yes, we will look out for the new subtype information.

>
> Jon.
>
> --
> Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop
>
Regards,
Duc Dang.