[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161206090851.GA1704@ct-lt-587>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 09:08:51 +0000
From: Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] v4l: async: make v4l2 coexist with devicetree nodes
in a dt overlay
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:13:38AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Javi,
>
> On 12/05/2016 07:09 AM, Javi Merino wrote:
> > In asds configured with V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_OF, the v4l2 subdev can be
> > part of a devicetree overlay, for example:
> >
> > &media_bridge {
> > ...
> > my_port: port@0 {
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> > reg = <0>;
> > ep: endpoint@0 {
> > remote-endpoint = <&camera0>;
> > };
> > };
> > };
> >
> > / {
> > fragment@0 {
> > target = <&i2c0>;
> > __overlay__ {
> > my_cam {
> > compatible = "foo,bar";
> > port {
> > camera0: endpoint {
> > remote-endpoint = <&my_port>;
> > ...
> > };
> > };
> > };
> > };
> > };
> > };
> >
> > Each time the overlay is applied, its of_node pointer will be
> > different. We are not interested in matching the pointer, what we
> > want to match is that the path is the one we are expecting. Change to
> > use of_node_cmp() so that we continue matching after the overlay has
> > been removed and reapplied.
> >
> > Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> > Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>
> > ---
>
> I already reviewed v1 but you didn't carry the tag. So again:
I forgot to add it :(
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Thanks!
Javi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists