[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161206115507.GD2498@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 11:55:08 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
jesper.nilsson@...s.com, lars.persson@...s.com,
niklas.cassel@...s.com, heiko@...ech.de,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
ck.hu@...iatek.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: kernel: Add SMC structure parameter
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 01:44:22AM -0600, Andy Gross wrote:
> This patch adds a quirk parameter to the arm_smccc_smc call. The quirk
> structure allows for specialized SMC operations due to SoC specific
> requirements.
>
> This patch also fixes up all the current users of the arm_smccc_smc API.
>
> This patch and partial implementation was suggested by Will Deacon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/smccc-call.S | 3 ++-
> arch/arm/mach-artpec/board-artpec6.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 7 +++++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S | 3 ++-
> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-ddr.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/firmware/meson/meson_sm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/firmware/psci.c | 2 +-
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> 11 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Thanks for respinning this; I'd forgotten about it!
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smccc-call.S b/arch/arm/kernel/smccc-call.S
> index 37669e7..e77950a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smccc-call.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smccc-call.S
> @@ -47,7 +47,8 @@ UNWIND( .fnend)
> /*
> * void smccc_smc(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
> * unsigned long a3, unsigned long a4, unsigned long a5,
> - * unsigned long a6, unsigned long a7, struct arm_smccc_res *res)
> + * unsigned long a6, unsigned long a7, struct arm_smccc_res *res,
> + * struct arm_smccc_quirk *quirk)
I'd not thought of doing it like this -- I envisaged embedding the quirk
structure into arm_smccc_res, but this works too. I wonder if we could avoid
having to pass NULL everywhere if we renamed arm_smccc_{hvc.smc} and added
a default wrapper around them?
For example, rename arm_smccc_smc to __arm_smccc_smc, add a macro called
arm_smccc_smc that passes a NULL argument for the quirk, then finally add
a macro arm_smccc_smc_quirk that takes the additional parameter?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists