lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2016 09:38:19 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Cc:     linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the btrfs-kdave tree

Hi David,

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:02:30 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the btrfs-kdave tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
> 
> fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'run_delalloc_range':
> fs/btrfs/inode.c:1219:9: warning: 'cur_end' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>    start = cur_end + 1;
>          ^
> fs/btrfs/inode.c:1172:6: note: 'cur_end' was declared here
>   u64 cur_end;
>       ^
> 
> Introduced by commit
> 
>   cow_file_range_async ("btrfs: Introduce COMPRESS reserve type to fix false enospc for compression")
> 
> Presumably a false positive because ASSERT(0) panics?

Actually it does not if CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT is not set (which it isn't
for the above build), so this is not a false positive.  I am still
seeing this.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ