[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1481089167-1674826-1-git-send-email-green@linuxhacker.ru>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 00:39:27 -0500
From: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
Subject: [PATCH] staging/lustre/lnetselftest: Fix potential integer overflow
It looks like if the passed in parameter is not present, but
parameter length is non zero, then sanity checks on the length
are skipped and lstcon_test_add() might then use incorrect
allocation that's prone to integer overflow size.
This patch ensures that parameter len is zero if parameter is
not present.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conctl.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conctl.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conctl.c
index 02847bf..9438302 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conctl.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conctl.c
@@ -742,6 +742,10 @@ static int lst_test_add_ioctl(lstio_test_args_t *args)
PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(struct lstcon_test)))
return -EINVAL;
+ /* Enforce zero parameter length if there's no parameter */
+ if (!args->lstio_tes_param && args->lstio_tes_param_len)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
LIBCFS_ALLOC(batch_name, args->lstio_tes_bat_nmlen + 1);
if (!batch_name)
return rc;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists