[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <601c4a7b-0806-e0dc-9783-7484d7c9ed64@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 13:38:29 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org
Cc: Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] perf report: Show inline stack
So sorry, please ignore this v2 patch series.
I missed the Arnaldo other comments which were added in the code.
I will RESEND v2 patch series later.
On 12/7/2016 9:30 PM, Jin Yao wrote:
> v2: Thanks so much for Arnaldo's comments!
> The modifications are:
>
> 1. Divide v1 patch "perf report: Find the inline stack for a
> given address" into 2 patches:
> a. perf report: Refactor common code in srcline.c
> b. perf report: Find the inline stack for a given address
>
> Some function names are changed:
> dso_name_get -> dso__name
> ilist_apend -> inline_list__append
> get_inline_node -> inline__node
> free_inline_node -> inline_node__free
>
> 2. Since the function name are changed, update following patches
> accordingly.
> a. perf report: Show inline stack in stdio mode
> b. perf report: Show inline stack in browser mode
>
> 3. Rebase to latest perf/core branch. This patch is impacted.
> a. perf report: Create a new option "--inline"
>
> v1: Initial post
>
> It would be useful for perf to support a mode to query the
> inline stack for callgraph addresses. This would simplify
> finding the right code in code that does a lot of inlining.
>
> For example, the c code:
>
> static inline void f3(void)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < 1000;) {
>
> if(i%2)
> i++;
> else
> i++;
> }
> printf("hello f3\n"); /* D */
> }
>
> /* < CALLCHAIN: f2 <- f1 > */
> static inline void f2(void)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> f3(); /* C */
> }
> }
>
> /* < CALLCHAIN: f1 <- main > */
> static inline void f1(void)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> f2(); /* B */
> }
> }
>
> /* < CALLCHAIN: main <- TOP > */
> int main()
> {
> struct timeval tv;
> time_t start, end;
>
> gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
> start = end = tv.tv_sec;
> while((end - start) < 5) {
> f1(); /* A */
> gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
> end = tv.tv_sec;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> The printed inline stack is:
>
> 0.05% test2 test2 [.] main
> |
> ---/home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:27 (inline)
> /home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:35 (inline)
> /home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:45 (inline)
> /home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:61 (inline)
>
> I tag A/B/C/D in above c code to indicate the source line,
> actually the inline stack is equal to:
>
> 0.05% test2 test2 [.] main
> |
> ---D
> C
> B
> A
>
> Jin Yao (5):
> perf report: Refactor common code in srcline.c
> perf report: Find the inline stack for a given address
> perf report: Create a new option "--inline"
> perf report: Show inline stack in stdio mode
> perf report: Show inline stack in browser mode
>
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt | 4 +
> tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 2 +
> tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 98 ++++++++++++++-
> tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c | 56 ++++++++-
> tools/perf/util/hist.c | 5 +
> tools/perf/util/sort.h | 1 +
> tools/perf/util/srcline.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> tools/perf/util/symbol.h | 3 +-
> tools/perf/util/util.h | 14 +++
> 9 files changed, 356 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists