[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161207143007.GG8257@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:30:07 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: jolsa@...nel.org, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] perf report: Show inline stack
Em Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:38:29PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
> So sorry, please ignore this v2 patch series.
>
> I missed the Arnaldo other comments which were added in the code.
>
> I will RESEND v2 patch series later.
No problem, but in the future just bump the version, i.e. ask for me to
disregard v2 and wait for v3 :-)
And thanks a lot for taking the time to address my requests and
suggestions, really appreciated!
- Arnaldo
>
> On 12/7/2016 9:30 PM, Jin Yao wrote:
> > v2: Thanks so much for Arnaldo's comments!
> > The modifications are:
> >
> > 1. Divide v1 patch "perf report: Find the inline stack for a
> > given address" into 2 patches:
> > a. perf report: Refactor common code in srcline.c
> > b. perf report: Find the inline stack for a given address
> >
> > Some function names are changed:
> > dso_name_get -> dso__name
> > ilist_apend -> inline_list__append
> > get_inline_node -> inline__node
> > free_inline_node -> inline_node__free
> >
> > 2. Since the function name are changed, update following patches
> > accordingly.
> > a. perf report: Show inline stack in stdio mode
> > b. perf report: Show inline stack in browser mode
> >
> > 3. Rebase to latest perf/core branch. This patch is impacted.
> > a. perf report: Create a new option "--inline"
> >
> > v1: Initial post
> >
> > It would be useful for perf to support a mode to query the
> > inline stack for callgraph addresses. This would simplify
> > finding the right code in code that does a lot of inlining.
> >
> > For example, the c code:
> >
> > static inline void f3(void)
> > {
> > int i;
> > for (i = 0; i < 1000;) {
> >
> > if(i%2)
> > i++;
> > else
> > i++;
> > }
> > printf("hello f3\n"); /* D */
> > }
> >
> > /* < CALLCHAIN: f2 <- f1 > */
> > static inline void f2(void)
> > {
> > int i;
> > for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> > f3(); /* C */
> > }
> > }
> >
> > /* < CALLCHAIN: f1 <- main > */
> > static inline void f1(void)
> > {
> > int i;
> > for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> > f2(); /* B */
> > }
> > }
> >
> > /* < CALLCHAIN: main <- TOP > */
> > int main()
> > {
> > struct timeval tv;
> > time_t start, end;
> >
> > gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
> > start = end = tv.tv_sec;
> > while((end - start) < 5) {
> > f1(); /* A */
> > gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
> > end = tv.tv_sec;
> > }
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > The printed inline stack is:
> >
> > 0.05% test2 test2 [.] main
> > |
> > ---/home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:27 (inline)
> > /home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:35 (inline)
> > /home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:45 (inline)
> > /home/perf-dev/lck-2867/test/test2.c:61 (inline)
> >
> > I tag A/B/C/D in above c code to indicate the source line,
> > actually the inline stack is equal to:
> >
> > 0.05% test2 test2 [.] main
> > |
> > ---D
> > C
> > B
> > A
> >
> > Jin Yao (5):
> > perf report: Refactor common code in srcline.c
> > perf report: Find the inline stack for a given address
> > perf report: Create a new option "--inline"
> > perf report: Show inline stack in stdio mode
> > perf report: Show inline stack in browser mode
> >
> > tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt | 4 +
> > tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 2 +
> > tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 98 ++++++++++++++-
> > tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c | 56 ++++++++-
> > tools/perf/util/hist.c | 5 +
> > tools/perf/util/sort.h | 1 +
> > tools/perf/util/srcline.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > tools/perf/util/symbol.h | 3 +-
> > tools/perf/util/util.h | 14 +++
> > 9 files changed, 356 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists