linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: RFC: re-synchronize TSCs to boot cpu TSC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612080854420.3400@nanos>
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2016 08:56:48 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     sroland@...are.com
cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Roland Scheidegger <rscheidegger_lists@...peed.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: RFC: re-synchronize TSCs to boot cpu TSC

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, sroland@...are.com wrote:

> From: Roland Scheidegger <rscheidegger_lists@...peed.ch>
> 
> Some bios (Dell T5810 here) mess up the perfectly synced TSCs on boot
> and resume (probably trying to set some continuous time, but writing
> TSC directly instead of TSC_ADJUST which can only result in failure).
> This will cause the kernel to reject the tsc as clocksource due to
> the detected time warp.
> Try to fix this up by syncing the TSCs of non-boot cpus to the boot
> cpu, both on boot and resume.
> I've got some use case here which relies on really fast time
> measurements, without TSCs things run noticeably slower (ok the
> measurements probably are excessive) (and the timing information is
> probably useless too without TSCs).
> (This is quite a big hack, I have no idea what happens with
> multi-socket systems for instance, but it near certainly won't be
> right. I really don't know what I'm doing here, it is not a proper
> patch but a working (for me) proof-of-concept hack I've been using
> since a while although actually only with kernel 4.4 - I suppose
> some proper quirk would be needed. I guess there's also some chance
> SMM in general could do further damage to TSCs sometimes making this
> hack fail.)

Can you please try

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/timers

which contains a solution to this problem.

Thanks,

	tglx