| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20161208110552.GA17398@red-moon>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:05:52 +0000
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
lenb@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
marc.zyngier@....com, timur@...eaurora.org, cov@...eaurora.org,
agross@...eaurora.org, harba@...eaurora.org, jcm@...hat.com,
msalter@...hat.com, mlangsdo@...hat.com, ahs3@...hat.com,
astone@...hat.com, graeme.gregory@...aro.org, guohanjun@...wei.com,
charles.garcia-tobin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/3] ACPI: Add support for ResourceSource/IRQ domain
mapping
Hi Agustin,
please CC me for next version.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 05:57:37PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
> When an Extended IRQ Resource contains a valid ResourceSource
> use it to map the IRQ on the domain associated with the ACPI
> device referenced.
>
> With this in place an irqchip driver can create its domain using
> irq_domain_create_linear and pass the device fwnode to create
> the domain mapping. When dependent devices are probed these
> changes allow the ACPI core find the domain and map the IRQ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/{gsi.c => irq.c} | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
[...]
> -static void acpi_dev_get_irqresource(struct resource *res, u32 gsi,
> +static void acpi_dev_get_irqresource(struct resource *res, u32 hwirq,
> + struct fwnode_handle *source,
> u8 triggering, u8 polarity, u8 shareable,
> bool legacy)
> {
> int irq, p, t;
>
> - if (!valid_IRQ(gsi)) {
> - acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, gsi);
> + if (!source && !valid_IRQ(hwirq)) {
If you make source a struct acpi_resource_source pointer it could be:
if (source || !valid_IRQ(hwirq))
Actually we would not even need to pass the pointer, if we detect
an acpi_resource_source dependency we can just disable the resource
(without even looking-up the fwnode_handle, see below), it is a design
choice we have to make.
> + acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, hwirq);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -402,25 +403,25 @@ static void acpi_dev_get_irqresource(struct resource *res, u32 gsi,
> * using extended IRQ descriptors we take the IRQ configuration
> * from _CRS directly.
> */
> - if (legacy && !acpi_get_override_irq(gsi, &t, &p)) {
> + if (legacy && !acpi_get_override_irq(hwirq, &t, &p)) {
> u8 trig = t ? ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE : ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE;
> u8 pol = p ? ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW : ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH;
>
> if (triggering != trig || polarity != pol) {
> - pr_warning("ACPI: IRQ %d override to %s, %s\n", gsi,
> - t ? "level" : "edge", p ? "low" : "high");
> + pr_warn("ACPI: IRQ %d override to %s, %s\n", hwirq,
> + t ? "level" : "edge", p ? "low" : "high");
> triggering = trig;
> polarity = pol;
> }
> }
>
> res->flags = acpi_dev_irq_flags(triggering, polarity, shareable);
> - irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, gsi, triggering, polarity);
> + irq = acpi_register_irq(source, hwirq, triggering, polarity);
> if (irq >= 0) {
> res->start = irq;
> res->end = irq;
> } else {
> - acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, gsi);
> + acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, hwirq);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -448,6 +449,7 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares, int index,
> {
> struct acpi_resource_irq *irq;
> struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq;
> + struct fwnode_handle *src;
>
> switch (ares->type) {
> case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
> @@ -460,7 +462,7 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares, int index,
> acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, 0);
> return false;
> }
> - acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, irq->interrupts[index],
> + acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, irq->interrupts[index], NULL,
> irq->triggering, irq->polarity,
> irq->sharable, true);
> break;
> @@ -470,7 +472,8 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares, int index,
> acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, 0);
> return false;
> }
> - acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index],
> + src = acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(&ext_irq->resource_source);
I think the only pending question on my side for this series is whether
we still carry out the domain look-up here (as you are doing now), or,
if we detect a resource_source dependency, we just disable the resource
and leave the deferred probing mechanism to deal with it, this will
completely decouple the current resource parsing from the deferred probe
mechanism that you are introducing; basically this is equivalent to
saying "if the IRQ resource has a dependency let's resolve it at
acpi_irq_get() time, not now".
I am fine either way, I just think that leaving the domain look-up
in the middle of the IRQ resource parsing is not really clean-cut.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> + acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index], src,
> ext_irq->triggering, ext_irq->polarity,
> ext_irq->sharable, false);
> break;
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 61a3d90..154e576 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -321,6 +321,25 @@ void acpi_set_irq_model(enum acpi_irq_model_id model,
> */
> void acpi_unregister_gsi (u32 gsi);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI
> +struct fwnode_handle *
> +acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(const struct acpi_resource_source *source);
> +int acpi_register_irq(struct fwnode_handle *source, u32 hwirq, int trigger,
> + int polarity);
> +void acpi_unregister_irq(struct fwnode_handle *source, u32 hwirq);
> +#else
> +#define acpi_get_irq_source_fwhandle(source) (NULL)
> +static inline int acpi_register_irq(struct fwnode_handle *source, u32 hwirq,
> + int trigger, int polarity)
> +{
> + return acpi_register_gsi(NULL, hwirq, trigger, polarity);
> +}
> +static inline void acpi_unregister_irq(struct fwnode_handle *source, u32 hwirq)
> +{
> + acpi_unregister_gsi(hwirq);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> struct pci_dev;
>
> int acpi_pci_irq_enable (struct pci_dev *dev);
> --
> Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. on behalf of the Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists