[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161208105602.GA11382@elgon.mountain>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:56:03 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] x86/ldt: make a size variable unsigned
My static checker complains that we put an upper bound on the "size"
variable but not a lower bound. The checker is not smart enough to know
the possible ranges of "old_mm->context.ldt->size" from
init_new_context_ldt() so it thinks maybe it could be negative.
Let's make it unsigned to silence the warning and future proof the code
a bit.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
index 4d12cdf2b453..d6320c63be45 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static void flush_ldt(void *current_mm)
}
/* The caller must call finalize_ldt_struct on the result. LDT starts zeroed. */
-static struct ldt_struct *alloc_ldt_struct(int size)
+static struct ldt_struct *alloc_ldt_struct(unsigned int size)
{
struct ldt_struct *new_ldt;
int alloc_size;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists