[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161209145947.5766-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:59:47 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] nvme-fabrics: remove some logically dead code performing redundant ret checks
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The check to see if ret is non-zero and return this rather than count
is redundant in two occassions. It is redundant because prior to this
check, the return code ret is already checked for a non-zero error
return value and we return from the function at that point.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
index bcb8ebe..4e8e6a2 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
@@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ fcloop_create_remote_port(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
rport->lport = nport->lport;
nport->rport = rport;
- return ret ? ret : count;
+ return count;
}
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ fcloop_create_target_port(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
tport->lport = nport->lport;
nport->tport = tport;
- return ret ? ret : count;
+ return count;
}
--
2.10.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists