[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jUCHSM90yEoygAbKVY3ySaWQk-Cp6qkd+6ESH74J2_8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 16:02:24 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, jolsa@...hat.com,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 8/8] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use CPPC to get max performance
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On 2016-12-08 00:29:29 [+0100], Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Agreed, but the bug fixed by the first hunk is real too. I'd fix it a bit
>> differently, though:
>>
>> Tentatively-signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Is there anything you want me to do here? The hunk in
> acpi_cppc_processor_exit() is unchanged and is the one that led to the
> crash. The other hunk I made (the one you changed) was something I
> noticed while looking at the code - nothing that hit me directly.
OK, thanks.
I'll add a changelog to the patch and resend it later today.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists