linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87eg1g16r8.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date:   Sat, 10 Dec 2016 10:19:07 +0100
From:   Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:     Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Cc:     daniel@...que.org, haojian.zhuang@...il.com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] pinctrl:pxa:pinctrl-pxa2xx:- No need of devm functions

Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com> writes:

Hi Arvind,

> In functions pxa2xx_build_functions, the memory allocated for
> 'functions' is live within the function only. After the
> allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is
> no need to allocate memory for 'functions' with devm function
> so replace devm_kcalloc  with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree.

That's not very true : the "need" is to spare the "manual" kfree you're adding
in your patch for one, and make it consistent with pxa2xx_build_groups() and
pxa2xx_build_state() for two.

Therefore I'm not very thrilled by this patch and unless it fixes a defect in
the driver I'd rather not have it in.

Cheers.

--
Robert