lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:16:27 -0800
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Gianpaolo <gianpaoloc@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 26/33] Revert "ACPI: Execute _PTS before system reboot"

4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

commit 9713adc2a1a5488f4889c657a0c0ce0c16056d3c upstream.

Revert commit 2c85025c75df (ACPI: Execute _PTS before system reboot)
as it is reported to cause poweroff and reboot to hang on Dell
Latitude E7250.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187061
Reported-by:  Gianpaolo <gianpaoloc@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/acpi/sleep.c |   29 ++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -47,32 +47,15 @@ static void acpi_sleep_tts_switch(u32 ac
 	}
 }
 
-static void acpi_sleep_pts_switch(u32 acpi_state)
-{
-	acpi_status status;
-
-	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(NULL, "\\_PTS", acpi_state);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
-		/*
-		 * OS can't evaluate the _PTS object correctly. Some warning
-		 * message will be printed. But it won't break anything.
-		 */
-		printk(KERN_NOTICE "Failure in evaluating _PTS object\n");
-	}
-}
-
-static int sleep_notify_reboot(struct notifier_block *this,
+static int tts_notify_reboot(struct notifier_block *this,
 			unsigned long code, void *x)
 {
 	acpi_sleep_tts_switch(ACPI_STATE_S5);
-
-	acpi_sleep_pts_switch(ACPI_STATE_S5);
-
 	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
-static struct notifier_block sleep_notifier = {
-	.notifier_call	= sleep_notify_reboot,
+static struct notifier_block tts_notifier = {
+	.notifier_call	= tts_notify_reboot,
 	.next		= NULL,
 	.priority	= 0,
 };
@@ -916,9 +899,9 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
 	pr_info(PREFIX "(supports%s)\n", supported);
 
 	/*
-	 * Register the sleep_notifier to reboot notifier list so that the _TTS
-	 * and _PTS object can also be evaluated when the system enters S5.
+	 * Register the tts_notifier to reboot notifier list so that the _TTS
+	 * object can also be evaluated when the system enters S5.
 	 */
-	register_reboot_notifier(&sleep_notifier);
+	register_reboot_notifier(&tts_notifier);
 	return 0;
 }


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ