[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2104bea-8028-dafe-cb64-e376fa7e45fb@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:19:21 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Block core changes for 4.10
On 12/11/2016 06:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Note that this pull will throw 3 trivial merge conflicts, since we had
> patches that went into mainline after 4.9-rc1 (upon which this branch is
> based), and one that will not show up in block/blk-flush.c. The latter
> is due to a fix that went in for the flush code using an old request
> flag that is now changed to a per-request one. To ensure that this all
> goes smoothly, I just merged 4.9 with this branch and provide that as a
> reference:
>
> git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block.git for-4.10/merge
>
> But really, the only one you to watch for is this line in
> block/blk-flush.c:
>
> /* for avoiding double accounting */
> rq->cmd_flags &= ~REQ_STARTED;
>
> which should now be:
>
> rq->rq_flags &= ~RQF_STARTED;
>
> and the three merge conflicts that do show up are trivially resolvable.
Since you have merged trees since that contain block drivers, you are
going to get a new merge conflict. There's one with mmc block now, which
is again just a switch from rq->cmd_flags to rq->rq_flags and using
RQF_foo instead of REQ_foo.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists