linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Block core changes for 4.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161214103123.20d9b2d0@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2016 10:31:23 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Block core changes for 4.10

Hi Linus,

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:52:29 -0700 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> Note that this pull will throw 3 trivial merge conflicts, since we had
> patches that went into mainline after 4.9-rc1 (upon which this branch is
> based), and one that will not show up in block/blk-flush.c. The latter
> is due to a fix that went in for the flush code using an old request
> flag that is now changed to a per-request one. To ensure that this all
> goes smoothly, I just merged 4.9 with this branch and provide that as a
> reference:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block.git for-4.10/merge
> 
> But really, the only one you to watch for is this line in
> block/blk-flush.c:
> 
>         /* for avoiding double accounting */
> 	rq->cmd_flags &= ~REQ_STARTED;
> 
> which should now be:
> 
>         rq->rq_flags &= ~RQF_STARTED;
> 
> and the three merge conflicts that do show up are trivially resolvable.

I have also been carrying a fix patch for the merge between the block
tree and the xfs tree:

Commits

  70fd76140a6c ("block,fs: use REQ_* flags directly")
  bbd7bb7017d5 ("block: move poll code to blk-mq")

from the block tree interacting with commit

  ff6a9292e6f6 ("iomap: implement direct I/O")

from the xfs tree.


From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:45:33 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] iomap: fix up for blk_poll and WRITE_ODIRECT change

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
 fs/iomap.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap.c b/fs/iomap.c
index fc2446242935..c9d6c1176345 100644
--- a/fs/iomap.c
+++ b/fs/iomap.c
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ iomap_dio_zero(struct iomap_dio *dio, struct iomap *iomap, loff_t pos,
 	get_page(page);
 	if (bio_add_page(bio, page, len, 0) != len)
 		BUG();
-	bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, WRITE_ODIRECT);
+	bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE);
 
 	atomic_inc(&dio->ref);
 	return submit_bio(bio);
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ iomap_dio_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length,
 		}
 
 		if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
-			bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, WRITE_ODIRECT);
+			bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE);
 			task_io_account_write(bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
 		} else {
 			bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_READ, 0);
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, struct iomap_ops *ops,
 
 			if (!(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI) ||
 			    !dio->submit.last_queue ||
-			    !blk_poll(dio->submit.last_queue,
+			    !blk_mq_poll(dio->submit.last_queue,
 					dio->submit.cookie))
 				io_schedule();
 		}
-- 
2.10.2


-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell