linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] block: check partition alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:56:00 +0900
From:   Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        hoeppner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] block: check partition alignment



On 12/15/16 17:45, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:33:47AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> For a regular block device, I agree. But in Stephan case, I think that
>> the check really needs to be against the physical block size, with the
>> added condition that the bdev is a DASD device (similarly to the zone
>> alignment check for zoned block devices).
> 
> Then they need to expose a chunk_size.  physical block size is defined
> as not having a meaning for the kernel.

Or create the block device with the logical block size set to the
physical sector size. Which would be even more simple and in fact
correct in this case since only physically aligned accesses make sense
for DASD.

-- 
Damien Le Moal, Ph.D.
Sr. Manager, System Software Research Group,
Western Digital Corporation
Damien.LeMoal@....com
(+81) 0466-98-3593 (ext. 513593)
1 kirihara-cho, Fujisawa,
Kanagawa, 252-0888 Japan
www.wdc.com, www.hgst.com