[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161215084553.GA19716@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:45:53 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hoeppner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] block: check partition alignment
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:33:47AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> For a regular block device, I agree. But in Stephan case, I think that
> the check really needs to be against the physical block size, with the
> added condition that the bdev is a DASD device (similarly to the zone
> alignment check for zoned block devices).
Then they need to expose a chunk_size. physical block size is defined
as not having a meaning for the kernel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists