[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612151826120.3470@nanos>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:26:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Kyle Huey <khuey@...ehuey.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] x86/process: Optimize TIF checks in
switch_to_extra()
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:44:02PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > void __switch_to_xtra(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p,
> > struct tss_struct *tss)
> > {
> > struct thread_struct *prev, *next;
> > + unsigned long tifp, tifn;
> >
> > prev = &prev_p->thread;
> > next = &next_p->thread;
> >
> > + tifn = task_thread_info(next_p)->flags;
> > + tifp = task_thread_info(prev_p)->flags;
> > + switch_to_bitmap(tss, prev, next, tifp, tifn);
> > +
> > + propagate_user_return_notify(prev_p, next_p);
> > +
> > + if ((tifp ^ tifn) & _TIF_BLOCKSTEP) {
> > unsigned long debugctl = get_debugctlmsr();
> >
> > debugctl &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF;
> > + if (tifn & _TIF_BLOCKSTEP)
> > debugctl |= DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF;
> > update_debugctlmsr(debugctl);
> > }
>
> Going by the toggle patter you have elsewhere, wouldn't that then be:
>
> if ((tifp ^ tifn) & _TIF_BLOCKSTEP) {
> unsigned long debugctl = get_debugctlmsr();
>
> debugctl ^= DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF;
> update_debugctlmsr(debugctl);
> }
See the next patch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists