[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161215193307.436sggu4zy4zezoe@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 20:33:07 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] i2c: Add STM32F4 I2C driver
Hello Cedric,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:26:25PM +0100, M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote:
> >> +static struct platform_driver stm32f4_i2c_driver = {
> >> + .driver = {
> >> + .name = "stm32f4-i2c",
> >> + .of_match_table = stm32f4_i2c_match,
> >
> > Is this needed?
> Without of_match_table, I could not match an I2C device instance from
> DT with this driver.
> So maybe, there is a misunderstanding.
> Could you please clarify your question ?
I thought (but I could be wrong) that if the driver is called
"stm32f4-i2c", it is used to match "st,stm32f4-i2c" even without
.of_match_table. If this doesn't work, please disregard my question.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists