linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] extcon: axp288: Remove unnecessary irq?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <58578372.8000909@samsung.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:51:30 +0900
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] extcon: axp288: Remove unnecessary irq?_en register
 writes

Hi Hans,

On 2016년 12월 19일 09:13, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Setting the irq_enable bits is taken care of by the irq chip when we
> request the irqs and the driver should not be meddling with the
> irq?_en registers itself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c | 19 +++----------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> index 7aec413..a27ee68 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> @@ -70,12 +70,6 @@
>  #define DET_STAT_CDP			2
>  #define DET_STAT_DCP			3
>  
> -/* IRQ enable-1 register */
> -#define PWRSRC_IRQ_CFG_MASK		(BIT(4)|BIT(3)|BIT(2))
> -
> -/* IRQ enable-6 register */
> -#define BC12_IRQ_CFG_MASK		BIT(1)
> -
>  enum axp288_extcon_reg {
>  	AXP288_PS_STAT_REG		= 0x00,
>  	AXP288_PS_BOOT_REASON_REG	= 0x02,
> @@ -83,8 +77,6 @@ enum axp288_extcon_reg {
>  	AXP288_BC_VBUS_CNTL_REG		= 0x2d,
>  	AXP288_BC_USB_STAT_REG		= 0x2e,
>  	AXP288_BC_DET_STAT_REG		= 0x2f,
> -	AXP288_PWRSRC_IRQ_CFG_REG	= 0x40,
> -	AXP288_BC12_IRQ_CFG_REG		= 0x45,
>  };
>  
>  enum axp288_mux_select {
> @@ -242,15 +234,10 @@ static irqreturn_t axp288_extcon_isr(int irq, void *data)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -static void axp288_extcon_enable_irq(struct axp288_extcon_info *info)
> +static void axp288_extcon_enable(struct axp288_extcon_info *info)
>  {
> -	/* Unmask VBUS interrupt */
> -	regmap_write(info->regmap, AXP288_PWRSRC_IRQ_CFG_REG,
> -						PWRSRC_IRQ_CFG_MASK);
>  	regmap_update_bits(info->regmap, AXP288_BC_GLOBAL_REG,
>  						BC_GLOBAL_RUN, 0);
> -	/* Unmask the BC1.2 complete interrupts */
> -	regmap_write(info->regmap, AXP288_BC12_IRQ_CFG_REG, BC12_IRQ_CFG_MASK);
>  	/* Enable the charger detection logic */
>  	regmap_update_bits(info->regmap, AXP288_BC_GLOBAL_REG,
>  					BC_GLOBAL_RUN, BC_GLOBAL_RUN);
> @@ -327,8 +314,8 @@ static int axp288_extcon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Enable interrupts */
> -	axp288_extcon_enable_irq(info);
> +	/* Start charger cable type detection */
> +	axp288_extcon_enable(info);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 

Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>

-- 
Regards,
Chanwoo Choi